I don't mind.  I plan on writing a clean site from scratch for doing the
performance evaluation. The test pages I used to perform the previous
tests will only work for tomcat 4.0. Which is why I plan on writing a
new demo site from scratch for my own testing purposes.

My existing test pages are far too complex to make fine grain analysis
easy. Part my motivation for writing a test site using different
techniques is to have well defined controls. This way I can isolate the
performance using a log4j on the serverside and from JMeter.

I have a personal photoalbum site, which is becoming un-manageable (too
many pictures). Since I was going to re-write the site to dynamically
build all the pages, I figured it was a good opportunity to use it as a
test case.

my plan is to have atleast 3 version of the site, since it's a simple
site. All the vesion would be tested with logging turned on and off.
This way I can calculate the time spent on each process and get a better
idea of exactly how it runs.

peter


Kin-Man Chung wrote:
> 
> I am opening the discussion in [EMAIL PROTECTED], if you don't
> mind.  I think there are others who may be interested in the topic.
> 
> jasper2 is in jakarta-tomcat-jasper.  You'll need to build jakarta-tomcat-4.0
> first, and then jasper2.  It just drops the jar files into tomcat build area.
> Ignore jasper34 in that branch.
> 
> Be warned that jasper2 is still under development, so it's quality is not
> release product quality yet.  Also, it generates pretty much the same code
> as tomcat 4.x, for now; so expect comparable performance.  Of course we'll
> need to change that!  :-)
> 
> It's great that you are doing performance evaluation for different versions
> of tomcat.  Can your jstl run in tc3 and tc4 without change?  Can we
> separated performance attributed to containers as opposed to those attributed
> to jasper?  For those jasper performance, how can we identify the most
> profitable improvements that we should do?
> 
> - kin-man
>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to