All right :)

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tomas Rokicki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:05 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: JSP parsing bug?


This isn't a bug; this is according to spec.  The parsing
of the <%...%> is done first, independent of whatever bytes might be in
there.  Thus, your code looks to the JSP compiler like

A declaration consisting of
"

        // <% comment "

Literal content consisting of
"

        final static int SOME_INT = 0xFFFFFFFFF;

        public void someMethod(){

        }
%>
This page demonstrates a parsing bug"

So, I'd say, no bug.  Just a common misunderstanding.

-tom

-----Original Message-----
From: Alf Scherer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 10:53 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: JSP parsing bug?


Hi,

I've discovered something that looks like a bug to me, although I'm not
sure whethter this should/can be classified as a bug. The following
behavour occurs when you put "<% %>"-JSP tags inside a java comment in a
JSP file. The code following the comment will be displayed on the page
when requesting the file.


You can try the following code snippet to see how it works out.

---- snip ----
<%!

        // <% comment %> 

        final static int SOME_INT = 0xFFFFFFFFF;

        public void someMethod(){

        }
%>
This page demonstrates a parsing bug
---- snip ----

Cya,
Alf


---------------------------------------------------------
 Alf Scherer        |
                    |
 CarrotMEDIA GmbH   |
 Saegewerkstr. 3    | Q: What is a programmer?
 83395 Freilassing  | A: A bio-chemical machine, turning 
 Germany, EU        |    coffee into lines of code
--------------------------------------------------------- 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: application/pkcs7-signature

Reply via email to