> I posted to the dev list earlier about needing a small,
> relatively lightweight version of Catalina to embed into
> another program. I spent the weekend putting together
> something that more of less fits my needs. (My needs
> include a relatively small jar, plus no use of the local
> file system) I ended up with a 260k jarfile of the catalina
> classes, plus another 75k or so of new Container classes.
> I suspect there's at least another 100k that can be
> trimmed.

> The MinimalTomcat code is definitely alpha quality, and it's
> only meant to support the particular subset of Catalina that I
> happen to need right at the moment. It is not, and is not
> intended to be, a complete reimplementation of the Catalina
> core classes. On the other hand, it's substantially smaller
> and less complicated, while retaining the same basic architecture.
> If anyone's interested, feel free to email me at the address
> below, or respond on the list.

Well, it's not that I want to advocate the "competition", but it seems to me
that Tomcat 3 is more useful for a "MiniTomcat", mainly because it requires
only JDK 1.1 (smaller JDK; J2ME is based on JDK 1.1, so maybe it could end
up being a "target"; that was one of Costin's pet projects, actually).

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to