> On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > I didn't write either APIs. Someone on the commons mentioned this project, > > so I went there. It seems to me that omitting the 'init' method is a glaring > > omission. > > The native part of the code looks miles ahead of damon's code, though :) > > Having an init() method is a good idea, and the way deamon works is not > bad - it's an usefull feature. > > However it's not the only way to do things - and I prefer to not > depend on the wrapper that starts tomcat to do it ( there are > many other good ways to start tomcat without requiring the daemon )
If it's "good ways to start tomcat" as a daemon, then I disagree (except if it's when embedded through JNI in Apache). At best, it will work as good as with the daemon code, so why bother ? > > The project looks inactive, so maybe it would be possible to talk to the > > authors and merge ? > > > > Eventually, this could end up as a top level project at Jakarta (seems > > useful enough functionality for me). > > A big +1 from me. > > It can start in commons, I think would be a _very_ usefull component. > The more I look at the wrapper code, the more I like it. Ok, I'll send then an email. And would participate in the project ? Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
