"Patrick Luby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Remy,
>
> This is great news!
>
> I scanned through the Unix code and noticed that it uses the chmod'ing
> executables with setuid bits instead of performing a JNI call to the setuid()
> and seteuid() C functions before and after binding of a ServerSocket (i.e. the
> place you should need root access if you are binding to ports 1 through 1024).
> This type of approach eliminates the need for a controller and slave process.
Then it's not my code... My code was written using setuid() and seteuid()...
Actually, the copy I have here also supports CHROOTING of the whole JVM
process, and real/effective group switching (as we say in Italy, "'na botte
de fero").
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
