Dne út 5. únor 2002 01:22 Micael Padraig Og mac Grene napsal(a): > [ ] They do. > Reason: > > [ X ] They don't. > Reason: It is not necessary. Why to block this functionality? Example: http://www.pig.cz will the same as http://www.pig.net/cz; http://www.pig.net will the same as http://www.pig.cz/en;
Using request.getServletPath) and request.getRequestURI() I shoul recognize the default language of the application and the "different languages" should share whole application including servlet mappings in web.xml. Why not? But for example http://www.pig.cz/monkey should not be configured and http://www.pig.net/monkey should. Why not? If the Tomcat should run only on Operating Systems, it will be good and sharing of the appBase is not necessary, because OS supports symlinks. But file systems of the Disk Operating Systems doesn't support symlinks well known from UNIX, so the sharing is only the solution for this. -- Oto 'tapik' Buchta -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
