+1

I think we should tag the code with jk_1_4 ( considering the jk that was
included with 3.1 == jk1.1, etc ). It seems jk_1_4 will work
with 3.3, 4.0.x and 4.1 ( and the C code can be used for 3.2.x for bug
fixes ).

Regarding jk2, I'm still working, the current strugle is with the unix
domain sockets ( since JFC commited the jk implementation, and I promised
I'll do the java side ). I did some more changes in mod_jk(2) config, now
seting "JkWebapp" in a Location context works for virtual hosts and almost
everything else. I do plan few more config changes - automatically
restrict WEB-INF, etc, and I want to get at least basic info out of the
status worker. On the java side we have a first version, but I still have
to integrate it with either the interceptor/connector, or ( assuming
everything works as it seems ) in JkServlet ( using what I proposed last
year, i.e. web.xml/'standard' servlets + 'trusted apps' + a bit of magic).
Sorry it takes so long, but I have a lot of other work to do...

Costin


On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Kevin Seguin wrote:

> there was a thread a couple weeks ago regarding what to do with j-t-c and
> tomcat 4.0.2.  i believe it was decided that the 4.0.2 release would contain
> the same jars from j-t-c (tomcat-ajp.jar, tomcat-util.jar) as 4.0.1 did.
>
> well, i just did some quick tests with the 4.0.2-b1 dist and the head of
> j-t-c, and all seemed to be in working order.
>
> so, i think it might be a good idea to try to release the latest stuff from
> j-t-c with 4.0.2 for a couple of reasons:
>
>   *) if we release and tag j-t-c along with jakarta-tomcat-4.0, i think
> it'll
>      be easier to do maintenance, fix bugs, etc..  i'm not only talking
> about
>      the java code in j-t-c, but also the c code.
>   *) there have been some bug fixes in j-t-c since 4.0.1 -- these may as
> well
>      be released :)
>
> thoughts?
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to