On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Paul Speed wrote: > Catch me if I'm wrong, but currently j-t-c is dependent on tomcat > code, right? I make this statement without having actually looked at > the code for the connectors. I'm going by recent discussions about > how an API change in Catalina broke the build for a connector.
j-t-c has 2 layers - the ajp implementation, and the container adapter. Right now we have support for 3.3 and 4.0 - other containers could be added. 4.1 didn't worked with the 4.0 adapter ( I think Remy fixed that ), but in general we should expect other versions of tomcat and we should expect different interfaces. The build process for j-t-c is detecting if a particular version of tomcat is installed ( we use the built version, not the sources ), and builds an adapter for what you have. The problem was when trying to build for 4.1 using the 4.0 adapter - but again, I think this is fixed now. > If this is true, then I think it would be a mistake to separate it > into its own list. Assuming the above paragraph is true, then I don't care too much - I'll be on both anyway :-) If the trafic becomes too big, we should definitely separate them, but what is big remain open ( tomcat-users is huge, I just can't read it without headaches - that's where a split will be most needed ) Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
