DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5288>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5288 org.apache.naming.resources.Resource should be an interface [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-12-05 15:01 ------- I don't agree with that. The implementation of Resource is not trivial, and using the Resource interface in another directory context implementation would make that implementation Catalina specific. If you're doing that, there should be no problem with extending a class. Wrapping will happen in all other cases, but it should be pointed out that using standard directory contexts with Catalina is not really supported (I didn't ever try it), and won't give very useful results even if it does work. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
