GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> While we're speaking of mod_webapp, could we update
> the configure since IT DIDNT WORKS when you have
> installed Apache 2.0.28 beta in a FHS system, ie:
>
> /etc/httpd2/build/
> /etc/httpd2/conf/
> /usr/include/apache2/
> /usr/lib/apache2/mod_*
> /usr/lib/libapr*
> /usr/sbin/httpd2
> /var/www2/
>
> I could build mod_jk under Apache 2.0, since it still
> didn't use APR, but couldn't build mod_webapp.
>
> apxs2 -q PREFIX => /etc/httpd2
>
> and from configure.in =>
>
> dnl -----------------------------------------------------
> dnl APXS 2.0
> dnl Note: APXS for 2.0 is broken, so we need to
> dnl "discover" some of the values manually hoping
> dnl to get the right layout.
> dnl
> dnl New vars: N/A
> dnl Upd vars: APR_CFGFLG APR_VARFIL APR_LIBDIR APR_INCDIR
> dnl -----------------------------------------------------
> MODULE="apache-2.0"
> local_prefix="`${APXS} -q PREFIX`"
> LIBTOOL="$local_prefix/build/libtool"
> APR_CFGFLG=""
> APR_VARFIL="${local_prefix}/lib/APRVARS"
> APR_LIBDIR="${local_prefix}/lib"
> APR_INCDIR="${local_prefix}/include"
> unset local_prefix
>
> Why not just add --with-apr-lib, --with-apr-include to
> help fix these problems !!!
Sounds a good idea. --with-apr-lib and --with-apr-include would be used to
overwrite ${local_prefix}/lib and ${local_prefix}/lib
>
> BTW, even when I modify the configure, I get a libwebapp.a
> but no libwebapp.so and so couldn't build mod_webapp.so !!!
But it uses -l webapp, so it should use libwebapp.a. Could it be that you have a
broken libtool?
>
> -
> Henri Gomez ___[_]____
> EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .)
> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 6:44 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Cc: Pier Fumagalli; Martin Kraemer
> >Subject: Re: Where IS mod_webapp ??
> >
> >
> >"Clere, Jean-Frederic" wrote:
> >>
> >> Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 21/11/2001 10:15 pm, "Gerard van Enk"
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >> Any comments?
> >> > >
> >> > > I think it's a good idea to make a release.
> >> >
> >> > I'm on a plane ATM, but +1 for me, J.F., would you be R.M.
> >for this one?
> >>
> >> I will try. At least I can make the tarball and retest the thinks :)
> >
> >I have prepared some prerelease tarballs.
> >I still have to tag and to retest my plaforms. And I will also
> >try to fix 4367
> >and 4930.
> >
> >Please have a look at http://www.apache.org/~jfclere/ and tell
> >me if something
> >is wrong.
> >
> >Cheers
> >
> >Jean-frederic
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Pier
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > To unsubscribe:
> ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > For
> >additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > Troubles with the list:
> ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >> --
> >> To
> >unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >For
> >additional commands, e-mail:
> ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
