DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4600>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4600

Tomcat 3.3 redirect behavior differs from Tomcat 3.2





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-11-02 22:18 -------
This is basically a problem with a buggy client.  The basic difference between 
a 301 & 302 response is that the 301 is cachable (IMHO this is a good thing).  
Personally, this is a WONTFIX, but I'll leave it open in case someone else 
feels that it is a problem.  However, with no other responses, I'll formally 
mark this as WONTFIX once there is a release plan for 3.3.1.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to