I'm not sure if the bug is actually in the Jaxp version..

I will try to reproduce it, to see what happens moving around crimson
jars..

For me seems it's in "Damn ClassLoaders" bug type.. :)

Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega


> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: viernes 5 de octubre de 2001 0:26
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3961] - FactoryConfigurationError on
> Servlet+JSP+taglib
> 
> 
> I know that Costin has strong feeling on which Jaxp version 
> we should ship
> with (I just don't remember what they are:). Does anyone else have an
> opinion?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 12:51 PM
> Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3961] - FactoryConfigurationError on
> Servlet+JSP+taglib
> 
> 
> > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
> > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> > <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3961>.
> > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
> > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
> >
> > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3961
> >
> > FactoryConfigurationError on Servlet+JSP+taglib
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------- Additional Comments From 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-10-04
> 12:51 -------
> > There seems to be a problem with the Jaxp jar files that 
> ship with RC1.
> If you
> > download Jaxp 1.1 from java.sun.com and replace the jar files in
> lib/container
> > with those, your example starts working.
> >
> >
> 
> 
> *----*
> 
> This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) 
> listed above 
> as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is 
> PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL.  If you are not an intended recipient, 
> you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any 
> attachment.  
> If you received this communication in error, please notify us 
> immediately 
> by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any 
> attachments.
> 
> 
> In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) 
> e-mail sent 
> through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential 
> or sensitive 
> information, such as social security numbers, account 
> numbers, personal 
> identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary 
> (unencrypted) 
> e-mail. 
> 

Reply via email to