Quick question. Is it possible to have Bugzilla wrap the description at 80
chars when it sends out the e-mails? One of the mail clients I use regularly
(an IMAP client) doesn't auto-wrap, so these descriptions are coming across as
one looooong line.
Also, do they still need to have "DO NOT REPLY" in the subject? It appears that
tomcat-dev is the reply-to header. Is there another reason why replying to
these is bad?
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3776>.
> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3776
>
> "Illegal to flush within a custom tag" exceptions
>
> Summary: "Illegal to flush within a custom tag" exceptions
> Product: Tomcat 4
> Version: 4.0 Final
> Platform: PC
> OS/Version: Windows NT/2K
> Status: NEW
> Severity: Major
> Priority: Other
> Component: Jasper
> AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Under Tomcat 3.2, which implemented the JSP 1.1 spec, I could not use
> certain custom tags within a (custom) include tag. I would get an
> exception that it is "Illegal to flush within a custom tag". I was told
> that this limitation was removed in the JSP 1.2 spec, so I switched to
> the Tomcat 4.0 betas. My application worked fine up to and including
> Tomcat 4.0-b7. Today I switched to the Tomcat 4 final release. I am
> again getting these same exceptions, which from my understanding should
> not be occurring. I was able to isolate the issue to the
> jasper-runtime.jar, which has changed between the two releases. If I
> replace this jar in Tomcat 4.0 final with the jar from b7, my
> application works.
>
- Christopher
/**
* Pleurez, pleurez, mes yeux, et fondez vous en eau!
* La moitié de ma vie a mis l'autre au tombeau.
* ---Corneille
*/
