>I'm +1 for the patch.
>
>My main concern ( and what I've looked for ) is to not brake 
>anything that
>worked - and from your changes it seems the case where 
>Content-Length is
>present will work exactly as it did before.

Seems fine

>If possible, please also update j-t-c. ( we can do that later 
>if you don't
>have time, but please check in the main branch soon - so we 
>can have it in
>the next beta )

If Keith agree, I'll do the port to j-t-c since the code 
there has been seriously refactored ...

Reply via email to