On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Keith Wannamaker wrote:
> Hi Costin,
>
> Oh, no, not at all, I understand now.
>
> However, what do you think about keeping the old String
> methods for compatibility with 3.2 interceptors?
> Something like:
:-)
All I can think at this moment is "how stupid I was
when I did the changes".
To my defense - the reason I removed the get/set was to
make sure the code is using the new API and to quickly
find the places where string-based methods were used
and replace them with more efficient MessageBytes methods.
If you have the changes in your workspace - please commit them,
it's not going to affect any existing functionality and
will simplify a lot porting 3.2 modules to 3.3.
Costin