> He is over on the Velocity lists being a pain in the ass still. :-)
>
> I just love him.
I love you too Jon.
> Our last flame war was about me wanting to get rid of the dynamic
> logging in
> Velocity and just make a dependency on Log4J. Eventually, I think he just
> gave up. Now that Ceki has the 25k .jar file, it is no contest.
Yes, after a few servings of Jon's usual "delicate" approach, Jason van
Zyl made a single post where he made sense of it all.
Sometimes Jon is right - he just has some trouble explaining it.
(He tends to explode something in the process.)
=;o)
Have fun,
Paulo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 6:31 AM
>
>
> on 8/6/01 9:24 PM, "Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Totally OT, bandwidth-wasting, irrelevant musings P.S. ...
> >
> > Where did that Paulo Gaspar cat go? That guy was always
> interesting in a flame
> > war, especially with Jon involved. Man ... dude did NOT like
> Jon, but he sure
> > loved Velocity. I wonder he went ... I really miss those days,
> back when we
> > were all so young and innocent ... it was a simpler time ;-)
> >
> > Anyway, Jon, I always thought that you should have used some of
> those flame
> > posts from Gaspar for some really sweet Velocity advocacy,
> maybe in your mag
> > articles and web site and stuff. I can hardly think of a more compelling
> > advertisement for Velocity than one of those, "Jon is in
> insufferable ass, but
> > I wouldn't use any other solution than Velocity." That speaks volumes.
> >
> > I really do miss that Gaspar guy though ... we liked him :-)
> >
> > - Christopher
>
> He is over on the Velocity lists being a pain in the ass still. :-)
>
> I just love him.
>
> Our last flame war was about me wanting to get rid of the dynamic
> logging in
> Velocity and just make a dependency on Log4J. Eventually, I think he just
> gave up. Now that Ceki has the 25k .jar file, it is no contest.
>
> :-)
>
> p.s. Below is a recent privately sent email that I got about the
> JDJ article
> I wrote...name/company removed to protect this fine enlightened
> individual.
> :-)
>
> -jon
>
