I posted one yesterday, for TC 3.2.3 and TC 3.3 !:
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]____
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Marc Saegesser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 3:46 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: I would like to know what tomcat release bug 345 was
>deferred to, still doesn't seem to be fixed on tomcat 3.2.3
>
>
>Basically, there just wasn't time in the 3.2.2 release
>schedule to get this
>one fixed. Tomcat 3.2.3 was released earlier than planned due
>to a security
>problem and this bug hadn't been addressed yet.
>
>If someone would like to post a patch I will review and commit it.
>
>Marc Saegesser
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stephen Dittmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 10:34 AM
>> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>> Cc: Henry Yeh; Irene Pan; Jack Egan; Wayne Tang
>> Subject: I would like to know what tomcat release bug 345
>was deferred
>> to, still doesn't seem to be fixed on tomcat 3.2.3
>>
>>
>> I would like to know the status of this bug and what release it
>> is going to
>> be addressed in ?
>> I found another person had filed bug 345 quite awhile back.
>We need the
>> proper date header response back to browser so it won't
>reload staic files
>> all the time. We don't want to use the IIS redirect as a way
>around this.
>> This issue did not seem to get fixed/addressed in tomcat 3.2.3
>> which we just
>> tried out.
>>
>> Here is a description of bug #345.
>>
>> Their is no date header in the Tomcat generated response, this
>> is critical in case Tomcat is not running behind Apache e.g.
>>
>> According to the HTTP specs (RFC 2616) the Date header MUST be
>> included by the origin server.
>>
>>
>> ------- Additional Comments From Marc Saegesser
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2001-03-21 11:46 -------
>> This won't be addressed for Tomcat 3.2.2 but will be evaluated
>> for a later
>> release.
>
