GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>>Pier:
>>A nice way to duplicate the job, indeed... Why not joining
>>Alex et. al and
>>
>
> Each contribution is good to have. If he feel more confortable
> using docbook, why not let him start some docs with it.
>
>
>>write the documentation with them? Just because you want to do it with
>>the DocBook DTD? A ridiculous excuse, as with a very simple XSLT
>>stylesheet you can convert the Anakia DTD in DocBook with no fuzz...
>>
>
> If an XSLT exist for converting Anakia to DocBook, it should be possible
> to do the reverse. Could you provide us, Pier, the XLST file to convert
> from Anakia to DocBook ?
>
Docbook is a *huge* file format. I've heard it described as "SGML in XML."
There are probably features in DocBook that would be very difficult to
automatically port back to XHTML.
> BTW, I didn't recall there was a vote on the list to decide if we should
> use DocBook or Anakia to produce documentation ?
>
Not yet. Another reason why nobody should jump the gun with a complicated
format that might end up having to be ported to XHTML.
My advice for potential authors is to use text or very simple HTML (<h1>,
<code>, <p>, <pre>, and <a>) so it'll be easy to shift to a common format
once we do decide. Also it'll mean you don't waste time making it pretty,
and focus on the text itself.
--
Alex Chaffee mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jGuru - Java News and FAQs http://www.jguru.com/alex/
Creator of Gamelan http://www.gamelan.com/
Founder of Purple Technology http://www.purpletech.com/
Curator of Stinky Art Collective http://www.stinky.com/