[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Casey Lucas wrote:
>
> >
> > Costin,
> >
> > sounds good.
> >
> > btw, when do you think the generator code in 34 will settle down
> > a little?
>
> Soon :-)
>
> There is only one more change in the generator layout - switching to
> a "visitor" pattern, with the tree representation of the page separated
> from the actual generator.
>
> If you are thinking to tagpool changes - please wait until RuntimeLiaison
> gets a bit of shape, I would like to provide some hooks for the container
> to control the pools. Again, the idea is to allow a "toolkit" model, where
> different components can be plugged in.
ok. just let me know when you think it's appropriate to
start adding some tag optimizations.
> Separating tree is very important to allow modules to do various
> optimizations ( like replacing common tags with equivalent in-line java
> code ) and to do the direct bytecode generation.
regarding "replacing common tags with equivalent in-line java code": what
exactly did you have in mind?
-casey
