On Wed, 16 May 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
> "may"? Do you have empirical evidence of that or did you pull that out of
> your ass?
I guess that concludes our discussion.
Costin
>
> >, and may
> > end up saving the javac in some cases - which would be a significant speed
> > improvement.
>
> Ah. Something else you pulled out of your ass.
>
> > And I also tried to explain: JSP doens't take more resources, a particular
> > implementation ( generator ) may take more resources.
>
> Once again, you don't listen very well. I'm not talking about JSP taking
> more resources, I'm talking about Jasper taking more resources. In case you
> missed it, Xalan is not a lightweight piece of Java code.
>
> > The current
> > java-only generator will still be available, there are many ways to
> > compile the JSP page - and xslt has some benefits you can't get otherwise.
>
> Oh, so now you are going to support both generators? You are so amazing!
>
> > Generating code is supposed to be resource intensive if you expect
> > reasonable runtime performance
>
> Is it supposed to be more intensive than it currently is? You are talking
> about slowing things down at least another 5-10%...I'm sure your users will
> really love that.
>
> -jon
>
>
