What's the problem here ?
I received only one copy....
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]____
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jay Doggett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 1:11 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: virus warnings and
>
>
>In addition to the multiple virus warnings I am now receiving multiple
>copies of each message sent to the list.
>
> Is it a wise idea to ban users who contaminate the
>list. I am starting to
>think that it is necessary.
>
>Jay
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 7:03 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: configure for jakarta-tomcat-connectors
>
>
>>My idea is to build one connector per call of configure/make,
>>--with-java should
>>build the JNI support, correct?
>>I have noted that common contains jk_jni_worker.c, should not
>>we move it in jni?
>
>no, jk_jni_worker could also be used into apache 1.3/2.0.
>And that's HOW IBM use mod_jk on at least AS/400 using JNI
>instead of AJP12/AJP13...
>
>>> Many users asked about statically compiling mod_jk in Apache,
>>> could you add a --with-apache flag ?
>>
>>Yes, but we cannot use apxs for that... Following the ideas of
>>mod_webapp we
>>should libtool for this purpose.
>>Then it is more easy to use libtool for everything.
>
>apxs is for DSO but the question was how to be sure the
>mod_jk stuff could be compiled statically in apache ?
>
>>>
>>> Do you think we could add also the config dir path to have
>>> default mod_jk.conf and workers.properties installed ?
>>>
>>> feature which could be added, is the config
>>>
>>> ie: --sysconfdir=/etc/httpd/conf (à la Redhat)
>>
>>If we use --with-apxs the conf is given by apxs, in case we
>>use --with-apache
>>yes.
>>This means we need to support "make install".
>
>PS: I commited your Makefile and configure stuff !!!
>
