GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > >actually, i think i might prefer something like mod_ajp and ajp_. if > >jtc means jakarta-tomcat-connector, that might be a little too > >generic. > >what do you call the next connector protocal? > > and ajp = Apache Jakarta Protocol (which not much clear) > so, do you envision one native library and one set of connectors (for apache, iis, etc.) that support all connector protocols? if so, then mod_jtc and jtc_ make more sense to me.
- [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renaming GOMEZ Henri
- Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renaming kevin seguin
- Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renami... kevin seguin
- RE: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renaming GOMEZ Henri
- Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renami... kevin seguin
- Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renami... Pier P. Fumagalli
- RE: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renaming GOMEZ Henri
- Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renami... kevin seguin
- RE: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renaming GOMEZ Henri
- Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renami... Remy Maucherat
- Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors re... kevin seguin
- Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connector... cmanolache
- RE: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renaming GOMEZ Henri