On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote:

> > The 3.3 adapter is not linked to the tomcat core, but more to the
> > low-level objects ( and most of the performance comes from that
> > layer ). In other words - minimal garbage generation, lazy evaluation,
> > and all the stuff.
> 
> Unless everyone's in a hurry to port mod_jk on TC 4 ASAP, I suggest waiting
> a bit. I'll be spending time on a "new" connector architecture for TC 4
> which will actually be very similar to the one in TC 3.3 (except hopefully
> even cleaner and simpler). That should make porting mod_jk much easier if
> there are still people who want to do that.

Well, "cleaner and simpler" means "better" to me :-) 

Maybe a good start would be to discuss that on tomcat-dev - there are
quite a few people with experience in the connector side, and I'm sure the
result will be better if we do it togheter. 

But this shouldn't stop the work on mod_jk and the proposed extensions
to ajp13. If the architecture will be similar with 3.3 ( lazy
evaluation, no garbage ) then it should be easy to do another refactoring 
and also have the JNI connector ported to a common codebase.


Costin 

Reply via email to