On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Steve Downey wrote:
> The only downside I see is that the security manager triggers the use of
> URLClassloader on a per JSP page basis. As I understand it, this class is
> broken w.r.t. Java 1.1.
Ok, now I'm completely confused - what's the relation between
doPriviledged and URLClassLoader ???
And it's not broken in 1.1 - it just doesn't exist :-)
>From all practical purposes, jasper34 doesn't require JDK1.1 ( but if it
happens to work - then that's just great ;-).
Costin
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 7:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Jasper34: diffs between 1.1 and 1.2
>
>
> Hi,
>
> There are few diffs between the runtime for 1.1 and 1.2.
>
> Some of them are obviously due to API changes ( additions mostly,
> only one change that I could identify - JspInclude ).
>
> Most are due to changes/fixes that went only in one branch ( various
> optimizations for 3.3, security manager for 4.0 ).
>
> We'll need to sync ( not very urgent ). There are few issues:
>
> - various optimizations - that's easy, but we need to take care in 1.2
> as some objects are created and need pooling
> ( Note: the runtime is critical for performance - as oposed with the
> generator. Need to keep garbage close to 0 )
>
> - It would be possible ( given the small diffs ) to use a single codebase,
> the 1.2, and compile using jsp1.1 to generate a 1.1 runtime.
> The extra methods will be ignored.
>
> The big problem is the change in jsp:include default. One simple way is
> to use a flag.
>
> That would be the best solution for maintainance ( that may not work for a
> jsp1.3, but for what we have right now the changes are finite and small).
>
> What do you think ?
>
> Costin
>
>
> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>This electronic mail transmission
> may contain confidential information and is intended only for the person(s)
> named. Any use, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
> the sender via e-mail. <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
>
