I apologize for not mentioning the version number. I guess I am used to
selecting the version I am reporting against and didn't remember to type it
in the description.
Can someone add an entry for Tomcat 3.3m2 in bugzilla? That is a little less
error prone than expecting folks to enter the version number in bug
description.
-arun
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Saegesser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 12:48 PM
> To: Arun Katkere; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Bug 1059] Changed - JSP pages fail to compile when
> referencing classes from apps classloader
>
>
> Arun,
>
> This bug wasn't closed. The status was updated to RESOLVED
> the and the
> resolution was changed to LATER. All this means is that it
> won't be address
> in 3.2.2 but is still open for 3.3 and later releases.
>
> Also, it would have been helpful if the description in
> initial bug report
> indcated the exact version it was being reported against.
> That would have
> saved me the time I spent trying to decide if it really
> applied to 3.2.2 or
> not.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Arun Katkere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 2:43 PM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [Bug 1059] Changed - JSP pages fail to compile when
> > referencing classes from apps classloader
> >
> >
> > Unless you are going with the new classloader architecture for
> > 3.2.2, which
> > I doubt, this bug doesn't apply to 3.2.2. It applies to 3.3m2 (I
> > had to mark
> > the version as "Unknown" since 3.3 doesn't have an entry in
> bugzilla).
> >
> > Are we accepting only bugs that apply to 3.2.2 and everything
> > that won't be
> > done for 3.2.2 will be unceremoniously closed?
> >
> > -arun
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 12:29 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: [Bug 1059] Changed - JSP pages fail to compile when
> > > referencing
> > > classes from apps classloader
> > >
> > >
> > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1059
> > >
> > > *** shadow/1059 Tue Mar 20 23:32:48 2001
> > > --- shadow/1059.tmp.21761 Wed Mar 21 12:29:05 2001
> > > ***************
> > > *** 2,11 ****
> > > | JSP pages fail to compile when referencing classes from
> > > apps classloader |
> > >
> > > +-------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ---------------+
> > > | Bug #: 1059 Product: Tomcat
> > > 3 |
> > > ! | Status: NEW Version:
> > > Unknown |
> > > ! | Resolution: Platform: All
> > > |
> > > | Severity: Major OS/Version: All
> > > |
> > > ! | Priority: Component: Jasper
> > > |
> > >
> > > +-------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ---------------+
> > > | Assigned To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > |
> > > | Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > |
> > > --- 2,11 ----
> > > | JSP pages fail to compile when referencing classes from
> > > apps classloader |
> > >
> > > +-------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ---------------+
> > > | Bug #: 1059 Product: Tomcat
> > > 3 |
> > > ! | Status: RESOLVED Version:
> > > Unknown |
> > > ! | Resolution: LATER Platform: All
> > > |
> > > | Severity: Major OS/Version: All
> > > |
> > > ! | Priority: High Component: Jasper
> > > |
> > >
> > > +-------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ---------------+
> > > | Assigned To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > |
> > > | Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > |
> > > ***************
> > > *** 36,39 ****
> > >
> > > Workaround is to use the common classloader, but we hear
> > > talks of more
> > > classloaders (for groups of webapps), and please keep
> > > Jasper in sync with these
> > > ! excellent changes.
> > > --- 36,43 ----
> > >
> > > Workaround is to use the common classloader, but we hear
> > > talks of more
> > > classloaders (for groups of webapps), and please keep
> > > Jasper in sync with these
> > > ! excellent changes.
> > > !
> > > ! ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 2001-03-21 12:29 -------
> > > ! This won't be addressed in Tomcat 3.2.2. It will be
> > > evaluated for a later
> > > ! release.
> > >
>
