> At c=10:
> 3.3.m1 Ajp12 (956/338)
> 3.3.m1 Ajp13 (966/390)
>
> At c=100:
> 3.3.m1 Ajp12 (920/343)
> 3.3.m1 Ajp13 (929/393)
Not good....
I guess we can focus on ajp13 and do few changes, fixing both doesn't
make sense.
Mea culpa, I did a lot of tests/optimizations on standalone but I didn't
reproduced them on the ajp side.
I've been a bit lazy lately, the profiles are not ready yet and there are
few bugs I'm draging... The good news is that it shouldn't be difficult to
at least double the performance for ajp13 in few days, I expect it to be
due to GC and the changes are easy to do ( I already done them in the
Http10 side ).
I guess I need few vacation days :-)
Costin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
