> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 3:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 3.3 Release Plan
>
>
> Larry Isaacs wrote:
>
> > If so, we may need a way to distinguish between those who are and
> > aren't committing to maintenance. Both of these +1's should be
> > counted when comparing against -1's. I wouldn't want to lose
> > any potential +1's because they didn't want to commit to
> maintenance.
> > Whether there are the 3 required committers for maintenance should
> > be a separate issue.
> >
> IMHO, having people vote +0 instead of +1 if they like the
> idea but don't have
> time to support it is *precisely* what you want. Otherwise,
> you can get into a
> scenario of a ton of +1s that say "great idea, as long as
> someone else does all
> the work", and where does that leave you?
>
> Craig
Oops. I oversimplified my wording. A +1 without committing
to mainentance would still be a commitment to help with the
release. Just not a commitment to go beyond the release.
Larry
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
