> -0. Why not make it optional for standard use as well? If I use Tomcat > for development only, I'm not concerned with security and don't > want to mess with policy files. Same here. There's a switch for the naming features, and I think it should be the same with the security manager. Remy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4 SecurityManager implementation Glenn Nielsen
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4 SecurityManager implement... Hans Bergsten
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4 SecurityManager imple... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4 SecurityManager imple... Remy Maucherat
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4 SecurityManager implement... Peter Donald
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4 SecurityManager imple... Glenn Nielsen
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4 SecurityManager implement... Anil Vijendran
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4 SecurityManager implement... Craig R. McClanahan