Jon Stevens wrote:
> 
> Therefore, as long as 3.x does not have support for 2.3, it is a dead end
> solution IMHO and adding support for 2.3 within 3.x would be a duplication
> of effort since we already have a 2.3 container (hence the reason why I am
> -1 and why Costin has already stated he plans to fork that addition
> somewhere else).

Welcome back, my friend :) :) :)

        Pier

--
Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.betaversion.org/~pier>

Reply via email to