It's odd that Nacho suggested that a look at the thread he posted might
be worthwhile. I've been lurking on this list for about 6 months (with an
occasional attempt to contribute) and it seems like the TC3.x vs TC4
struggle is like a forest fire that keeps getting almost put out and then
starts up again. Some issues are similar and some aren't.
As a result, a day or two I asked Bill Middleton if I could get bulk
access to the archives and do some semi-serious searching. He said that
as far as he's concerned, the archive belongs to the developers, so I
should post to the list and see if anyone has any heartburn. Does anyone?
If I don't hear anything for a week, I'll assume it's a non-issue.
Roy
--
Roy Wilson
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 12/18/00, 3:10:06 PM, Nacho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding RE
[MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x@2:
> Jon ha escrito:
> > Please look at all the information available to you about
> > what is happening
> > before commenting again.
> To give people a chance to get a personal opinion let's go to the REAL
> start of this thread, a interesting exercise ( at least for me )....
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=86951938807358&w=2
> Have good trip into the past!!! ( almost exactly 1 year ago )
> a quote from James D Davidson:
> "
> Given that this is a voluteer org, I think that we need to allow the
> revolutionaries to work on their stuff and let the evolutionaries work
> on
> their things and come up with a balance to let everyone work in the way
> in
> which they are comfortable. After all, it's stoopid to lock people out
> of
> doing what they want to since they are giving of their time and talent
> for
> free.
> "
> How can we reach the "balance" between TC3.3 & TC4.0?
> Saludos ,
> Ignacio J. Ortega
