Jon Stevens wrote: > on 12/9/2000 6:21 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > If it is Tomcat-specific, is there any reason it really needs to be a separate > > Jakarta project at all? Why not just absorb it into Tomcat? > > Problem with that in my eyes is that Tomcat is supposed to be the reference > implementation of the Servlet and JSP spec's, not of SSI. > Except that Tomcat already has "outside the spec" features up the kazoo, including your favorite (saving session state across server restarts :-). Even something mundane like serving static files or the invoker servlet is not part of the specification. What's the big deal about one more feature? > > -jon > Craig
- [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomcat Hans Bergsten
- Re: [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomcat Jon Stevens
- Re: [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomcat Hans Bergsten
- Re: [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomcat Jon Stevens
- Re: [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomcat Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomcat Hans Bergsten
- Re: [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomcat Jon Stevens
- Re: [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomc... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomcat cmanolache
- Re: [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomcat Hans Bergsten
- Re: [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomcat Jeff Turner
- Re: [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomcat Hans Bergsten
- Re: [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomcat cmanolache
- Re: [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomcat Hans Bergsten
- Re: [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomcat cmanolache
- Re: [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomcat Kief Morris
- Re: [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomc... Hans Bergsten