All,

First off, I want to thank you for nominating me to be a committer.  I'm very much 
looking forward to working on the project.

What are the next steps?  I just completed another good-sized chunk of work: I believe 
that I've fixed the multipart form bug (reports #536 and #542), and I rewrote the 
patch to fix the multiple cookies bug (no longer creating a new Enumeration for every 
request, as per Costin's suggestion).  I'm kind of assuming that I should just hold 
onto these (rather than bombarding Costin and/or the list with patches), on the theory 
that I'll be able to commit them myself soon.  Does that make sense?  Or I could just 
post the fixes to the list, if that would be better.

In the course of fixing multipart form, I modified doRead(byte[], int, int) to use 
System.arraycopy, which should make it much faster (and it's used for every single 
Post request, so that's good).  I want to do a bit more testing but it's looking 
pretty good.  The old code would also have died on a Request with a body but without a 
Content-Length (which is allowed for certain Transfer-Encodings by the HTTP/1.1 spec 
-- I just looked it up).  Possibly, I fixed Bug Report #468, which has to do with the 
content-length not being equal to the actual number of bytes sent -- I'll look into 
that one.

One other thing: in the course of getting this all working, I fixed what seemed to me 
to be a very serious bug with regard to the persistent connection between the web 
server and the container.  Basically, the read position into the buffer of request 
data wasn't getting properly reset to 0 for each new request, so reads would start in 
the middle of the request data in certain cases.  At least, that's what I found while 
I was working on this, but it seems inconceivable to me that this would have been out 
there without people complaining -- during my testing it was very confusing -- since 
it depended on what had happened during the previous Request, it seemed totally 
arbitrary.  Does this ring any bells for anyone?  If so, then I've fixed it ;-)

-Dan
-- 

Dan Milstein // [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to