on 10/28/2000 11:47 PM, "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jon,
>
> True! it is not a "bad thing" and the APL is less restrictive. GPL'ing the
> kernel makes sense for us as we fight an uphill battle. We put good code
> and need exchange to grow... it is a "protect the young" kinda thing, the
> "feedback" is feeding the group. Important for a baby.
>
> When the field is stabilized then it is another story... do you understand
> our position better? Like I said let's work around the "clean tree policy"
> for things your really want in your tree from us. For the rest it's clear
> on licenses in integration.
I'm sorry, I don't understand your position at all. I have started and lead
numerous large scale OSS projects, including Jserv and Tomcat without the
same fears that you seem to have for some unknown reason other than it
appears as though you don't understand how OSS works very well.
-jon
--
http://scarab.tigris.org/ | http://noodle.tigris.org/
http://java.apache.org/ | http://java.apache.org/turbine/
http://www.working-dogs.com/ | http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
http://www.collab.net/ | http://www.sourcexchange.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
