On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, marc fleury wrote: > > THIS IS WHERE THE GPL DRAWS THE LINE FOR VIRALITY > > 4 Aggregation is the weakest, it just means bundling of work. GPL doesn't > apply. > Which to me means that the closest together the two can ever be is if Tomcat talks to JBoss and vice versa via a network socket. Then the two licenses can co-exist. Any code written to accept a Java interface after that network socket speaks would negate the legality, so you are stuck with something like http as your protocol. So why not just resort to sharp sticks and rocks while we're at it? But then as someone just mentioned, it matters not a stitch what you or I or Jon says, it matter what they lawyers say. -- Nicolaus Bauman Software Engineer Simplexity Systems --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Ole Husgaard
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Jon Stevens
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Rickard Öberg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Nick Bauman
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Jon Stevens
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Nick Bauman
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Jon Stevens
- Re: [NOISE] [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... Nick Bauman
- Re: [NOISE] [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat... Jon Stevens
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Federico Barbieri
- [BUG TRACKING] Searches disabled Nick Bauman
- RE: [BUG TRACKING] Searches disabled Rob S.
- RE: [BUG TRACKING] Searches disabled Rob S.
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald