Yeah, I found that earlier today, and already modified logwatch.

I also confirmed that sgi-fam is only bound to loopback on this box, so that
makes me feel a little better.
Still a mystery what is triggering it, though.

-Hank

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Alejandro Perretta <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Read from some doc:
> sgi_fam service:
>     FAM is a file monitoring daemon that detects when files have
> changed and then performs some action.
>
> Courier imap doesnt need FAM, so maybe you can disable it.
>
> Read this thread:
>
> http://da.nieltiggemann.de/comp/fedora/logwatch_sgi_fam.html
>
>
> cheers.
>
> Alejandro Peretta
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Hank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > From what I remember, Courier IMAP requires FAM, which requires xinetd,
> > which is why I suspected the toaster.
> >
> > Sure, I can supress the messages, but I'd like to find out why
> Courier-IMAP
> > is generating them, and exactly what process or access is triggering
> these
> > errors.
> >
> > This box is a web and mail server behind two firewalls, so I don't
> suspect a
> > security hole, but I'd like to eliminate that possibility.
> >
> > -Hank
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Kristofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hank wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello All,
> >>>    I've been getting the following messages in my /var/log/messages
> file
> >>> for a while now, but I have no idea how to track down exactly what
> process
> >>> is causing them:
> >>>  **Unmatched Entries**
> >>> xinetd[5042]: START: sgi_fam pid=31985 from=<no address>
> >>> xinetd[5042]: START: sgi_fam pid=32347 from=<no address>
> >>>  Sometimes there aren't any, sometimes it is two or three, and
> sometimes
> >>> it could be 30 or 40 messages.   My hunch is that it has something to
> do
> >>> with the toaster, but really don't know enough to dig further.
> >>>  Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
> >>
> >> This has nothing whatsoever to do with toaster.
> >>
> >> But you can turn it off easily, just google a bit.
> >>
> >> cheers,
> >> Kristofer
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to