Hello,

same problem, building new toaster, sending message to list but got no reply.

IMHO xfs is best choice, i'm ussing reiserfs3 but have one problem
with large maildir (about 700k messages) - reisers screwed this
directory and whole filesystem (checking taked about 2 hours for 300G
hdd)

xfs have little bigger overhead than reiserfs(takes more cpu), but i
think (and from using both fs) that reiserfs is faster than xfs.

about partition:
if you want use clamav or spamassassin put tmp directory (creating tmp
files and directories from sa and clamav and qmail-scanner on separate
disc), if it's high load server put queue on separate drive too, user
maildir should be on separate drive too.

my suggested partition nad fs:
/ - reiserfs
/tmp - reiserfs
/queue - reiserfs
/user maildirs - xfs

each volume is separate drive (in best case, in worse case put queue
on same driver as /) for /tmp is not need raid

reiserfs has good performance in small files (which emails should
be:)) better than xfs, but in large number of files in directory is
xfs better, so if your queue will contain thousands of emails choose
xfs, in /tmp  should no left any files after processing (after
processing should be deleted)

sata raid - hardware or sofware ? (some hw are slower than sw)

All above are my experiences and my opinions, if someone have
different let know them.


2007/12/21, Jeff Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> We're setting up a new mailserver with a Gigabyte i-ram drive to handle the
> qmail queue, and qmail logs. The i-ram drive uses standard DDR modules, has
> a battery backup and is lightning fast - much faster than solid state
> drives. We'll use SATA RAID for the maildirs and remainder of the server.
>
> I'd like to get some input on the best filesystem for the i-ram drive. EXT3
> is out because writes are slowed to the speed of a hard drive. I'm leaning
> towards reiserfs or xfs. However, I've read (wikipedia) that reiserfs is
> easily corrupted. xfs seems the best.
>
> Anyone have any comments of suggestions.
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Jeff Koch, Intersessions
>
>


-- 
Lampa

Reply via email to