I'd like to ask this list before I jump into the regular SA list, but has anyone else had the experience where the server learns way more spam than ham? For example, yesterday my server learned 6533 spam but only 111 ham. As a result, I'm getting a lot of ham with a BAYES_99 score. I've been manually training SA with those messages, but it's not a long-term solution.

I recently upgraded from 3.0.x to 3.2.2, and I'm in the process of upgrading to 3.2.3.

Has anyone run into this before? Any good solutions? Right now, I'm considering raising bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam from 0.1 to 1.0 (or even 1.5 or 2.0) so it starts learning more spam. I may need to continue with my manual training for awhile though -- I came across an old bug report and it appears that SA won't learn something as ham if it triggered BAYES_99.

--
Tom Collins  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vpopmail - virtual domains for qmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/
QmailAdmin - web interface for Vpopmail: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/


Reply via email to