Bill Shupp wrote:
Tom Collins wrote:
On Jul 5, 2004, at 8:57 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I have patch netqmail-1.05 with netqmail-1.05-tls-smtpauth-20040207.patch
and have had a problem with both types of AUTH PLAIN. I am always getting
'501 malformed auth input' with either of the following :-
I just built a toaster on a dev box to test some SMTP AUTH client code I'm working on and I used Bill's current toaster document. All versions of AUTH are working fine.
The date stamp on qmail-toaster-0.6-1.patch from the toaster doc is Feb 13 15:31.
So, does this mean that it's more up to date than the 20040207 patch you used? I guess we'll have to wait for Bill's response.
My toaster 0.6-1 patch uses:
smtp-auth patch v. 0.4.2 by Erwin Hoffmann http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html
TLS patch by Frederik Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Here's the original
patch with documentation at the top:
http://inoa.net/qmail-tls/netqmail-1.04-tls-20040120.patch
So the TLS patch is actually slightly older that that used with the qmail/tls only patch. However, both smtp-auth and tls patches have been updated, and I'll be using those patches with the next toaster release, as well as the standalone smtp-auth/tls composite patch.
Incidently, the versions are always included that the top of the patch.
Regards,
Bill Shupp
I have put up a new composite smtp-auth/tls patch, using the latest versions:
http://shupp.org/smtp-auth-tls/
Regards,
Bill Shupp
