[toaster] qmail-ldap conflicts with qmail-toaster?

[Gustav Yeung]

Hi all,   I have been trying to compile qmail with qmail-ldap and qmail-toaster (0.5-1) on a Fedora machine. It seems that everything went well if I patch qmail with either qmail-ldap OR qmail-toaster, but not both. When I tried to patch the second patch (either qmail-ldap or qmail-toaster) the patching usually failed and I was asked this questions:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmail-1.03]# patch -p1 < /factory/factory/FEDORA/qmail/qmail-patches/qmail-ldap-1.03-20040101.patch [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmail-1.03]# patch -p1 < /factory/factory/FEDORA/qmail/qmail-patches/qmail-toaster-0.5-1.patch patching file Makefile Hunk #1 succeeded at 305 with fuzz 2 (offset 169 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 1001 with fuzz 2 (offset 107 lines). Hunk #3 FAILED at 1317. Hunk #4 FAILED at 1415. Hunk #5 FAILED at 1594. Hunk #6 FAILED at 1632. Hunk #7 FAILED at 1681. Hunk #8 FAILED at 1702. Hunk #9 succeeded at 2136 (offset 412 lines). Hunk #10 FAILED at 2598. 7 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej patching file README.auth patching file README.qregex patching file TARGETS The next patch would create the file base64.c, which already exists!  Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] y patching file base64.c Patch attempted to create file base64.c, which already exists. Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file base64.c.rej The next patch would create the file base64.h, which already exists!  Assume -R? [n]   At the end the compilation failed, no matter which answer combination I gave to the patch utility. Is there anyone succeeded in integrating the three together? What kind of response I should give to the questions?   Thanks!   Gustav