Hi Charles,
thanks for your answer.
I don't think that this issue be a toaster issue.
My point just is: why autoresponder is returning vacation messages from
address that not receive  email directly?

I mean:

sender --> recipient(with no autoresponder)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]         |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                     |
                     |-------forward to--> another recipient (WITH autoresponder)
                                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

If x@domain send directly an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: why should it receive
the vacation message from the another external  email address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] after a forward?
I believe that the [EMAIL PROTECTED] should return vacation message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (not to the original sender [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and if this is the
situation, entering in a double-bounce-discard stage between [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I hope my point be clear and not be understanding badly the whole topic.

BTW, I'm beginning too the 'scripting path' you suggested in your post.

best regards,
--Abel

On 19 Jan 2003, Charles wrote:

> Hi Abel,
>
> From your previous posting, I gather that the "problem" you are
> experiencing is actually the direct result of your client's wishes. As
> such, the toaster is working as designed, though perhaps not "desired".
>
> I understand that the customer thinks this is annoying. I would agree.
> He has created a kind of mailing loop.
>
> I am sure that with the flexibility of the tools in Linux and Bill's
> marvelous toaster, you could write some sort of script/program  to check
> the subject/body of each message sent to each account to make sure that
> no "extra" vacation announcements get through.
>
> The performance of the toaster may suffer (with the extra handling of
> each message), and the time you bill writing and debugging the "check
> redundant announcement program" might be extensive. However your client
> would be happy knowing he can set up as many forwards as he likes to
> each of his many accounts.
>
> Otherwise, why not just create a rule in the mail client (Evolution, MS
> Outlook, etc) to delete the offending announcements?
>
> Hope this helps
> Charles
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Could you help me with the following
> >
> > Briefly:
> >
> > if the file /home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com.ar/.qmail-info
> > looks like:
> >
> > &[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > &[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > &[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > &[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > &[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > AND each of these accounts have active vacation messages
> >
> > If I send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  I receive five vacation
> > messages, one from of each different final recipient;
> >
> > Is there any tip to avoid this behaviour?: I would receive one vacation
> > message just when i send a mail directly to an address, not from the
> > forwarded or aliased email address.
> >
> > BTW, if i set a vacation message for the "main" address
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED], when one message is sent to this address the effect
> > now is receive 6 vacation messages, one from [EMAIL PROTECTED] plus the 5
> > above ones.
> >
> > thanks in advance for your help
> >
> > best regards,
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Abel Lucano
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>



Reply via email to