On 20.10.14 21:05 , Thomas Adam wrote: > Well. That is a release cycle in itself. What is it you're really asking, and > why?
I'm just a bit confused. I looked at the release dates for the different versions and I couldn't make out a pattern. In 2009 there were several releases and after 2009 rather one release per year. I'm used to a somewhat constant release cycle, like every x months, especially if there is a lot of activity in the repo. I'm the maintainer of tmux in MacPorts and I was wondering, if I should create a variant that allows you to retrieve and compile the latest commit point. But I don't know, if that would be stable enough or not. I'm just trying to get a feeling for the project and whether only releases are considered stable. Do you think that would make sense, or should I update MacPorts only when a new release of tmux is cut? -- regards Helmut K. C. Tessarek lookup http://sks.pkqs.net for KeyID 0xC11F128D /* Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for chaos and madness await thee at its end. */ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
