Could we start having GPG signed tagged releases? It’s a nice security feature to have.
On Sep 15, 2014, at 8:36 PM, Helmut Tessarek <tessa...@evermeet.cx> wrote: > Since today the web site shows tmux version 1.9 instead of 1.9a. Also the > download link points to version 1.9. > > It's a little bit weird, because for a short period of time, the site even > showed version 2.0. > > Something's off. > > Cheers, > Hel > > -- > regards Helmut K. C. Tessarek > lookup http://sks.pkqs.net for KeyID 0xC11F128D > > /* > Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for chaos and madness > await thee at its end. > */ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Want excitement? > Manually upgrade your production database. > When you want reliability, choose Perforce. > Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > tmux-users mailing list > tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce. Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
