On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Nicholas Marriott <nicholas.marri...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do we need a new command? Why not just a window option log-file and if it is > set all panes in that window are logged? People who want everything logged > can set it globally. If we have a new command it is hardly different from > pipe-pane.
Wouldn't a window option mean that you couldn't stop the logging for a pane once it had started? Or start logging in a pane that already exists? That's not my preferred option, but I see your point about having a command that's almost no different from pipe-pane. When I first tried adding the ability for pipe-pane to write directly to a file, the implementation wasn't lightweight. Is this implementation light enough? If so, what would you think about adding this file-writing implementation to pipe-pane? Then panes could be logged directly to a file, the logging could be controlled on an individual pane basis but still happen automatically if desired, but there wouldn't be a new command. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
