On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 17:14:32 +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > I don't really see this as better? At the moment I think we stick to the > column we were on which seems more sensible. emacs seems to move to > column 0 which seems worse than either though.
Looking at the docs, Vim's behavior is based on the startofline option which isn't in vi. Basically this patch makes it like the Vim default rather than vi (and Vim behaves this way even if 'compatible' is set). Take or leave as you see fit (I doubt an option for this makes sense). --Ben ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
