Hi,
On 20 October 2012 00:38, Rob Hoelz <r...@hoelz.ro> wrote:
> Ok, I'm going to try sending this patch in again; I was able to view it
> fine in my mail reader last time, but it didn't render properly in the
> SF web view. I have also improved the patch a bit; it should now more
> closely conform to the style guidelines.
I'm not convinced by this read()/write() addition to the server --
surely the client should block on client_connect() or some such
instead -- assuming that's desired behaviour until all jobs are done?
Note also that because you're looking in the jobs array, are you sure
that having many jobs defined in one's status-{left,right} sections
with #(), with a low status-interval value, don't mean the server can
now take a long time to finish accepting connections in this case?
I'm not sure how much of an issue that might be, if at all, but it
might be worth checking.
-- Thomas Adam
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
tmux-users mailing list
tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
