Is this using gcc? I can't remember what we use _XPG4_2 to get.
I suspect changing it to _XPG6 will break Solaris 9 and possibly anything using Sun Studio 11 or earlier... On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 03:29:37PM +0200, Florian Ermisch wrote: > Hi Nicholas, > > the Solaris-specific retardness is reasoned as follows: > /* > * It is invalid to compile an XPG3, XPG4, XPG4v2, or XPG5 application > * using c99. The same is true for POSIX.1-1990, POSIX.2-1992, POSIX.1b, > * and POSIX.1c applications. Likewise, it is invalid to compile an XPG6 > * or a POSIX.1-2001 application with anything other than a c99 or later > * compiler. Therefore, we force an error in both cases. > */ > (see > http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/sys/feature_tests.h#341) > It's the same on Solaris 10 as in OpenSolaris. I think I got tmux > compiled on OpenSolaris by defining _XPG6 (additionally to the > header/linking stuff). > > Regards, Florian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
