On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:17:20AM -0700, Randy Stauner wrote: > maybe a path to consider would be to do conf-reading in a child process (a > fork)... > would that be able to wait, then when it's all done start passing values > back to the server?
It would be very complicated because there are >100 commands and almost all of them affect some data structure in the server. > not sure about that... it would definitely take some effort. > please excuse my ignorance of the greater tmux workings. > I'd love to learn more, though, and be able to help. > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Randy Stauner > <[1]ra...@magnificent-tears.com> wrote: > > true... that would make it much more difficult. > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Nicholas Marriott > <[2]nicholas.marri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The tmux server can never block > > References > > Visible links > 1. mailto:ra...@magnificent-tears.com > 2. mailto:nicholas.marri...@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
