On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:08:18PM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > Hi > > Thanks, but I don't like this. I think if it was a good idea, it would > be the default in GNU ld - and if that is still being decided, I am > happy to wait.
FWIW it has no known drawbacks with properly written libraries (IOW if you rely on libraries constructors in the sense of GCC __attribute__((constructor)) side effects for your code to work fine). I've been told this kind of ugly things can (may ?) happen for C++ code with heavy templating stuff. Though C is fine. > If an individual user or the packagers for a particular platform want to > do this, it is trivial to add to LDFLAGS. Makes sense. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madco...@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
