Dear Joe, On 28.02.26 02:03, Joseph Salowey wrote:
Unfortunately, the chairs did not announce this decision on the list (this is something that should be corrected in the process)
Thank you for acknowledging that the decision was not announced on the list. I would like to understand what "corrected in the process" entails. Does it entail moving the document from WGLC to WG document? Could you please explain in full detail?
Before I go point by point on your email (in the light of history of FATT process, namely RFC8773bis), I want to ask one process-related thing:
Is the chairs' "determination whether the change proposed by the document requires review by the FATT" considered as final or is the WG allowed to put its 2 cents after the decision is finally revealed? Also please note that at least three other participants of the WG have requested FATT review during WGLC. So it seems that I am not the only one who would have put trust in FATT for a controversial matter and if chairs allow, I would like to discuss it further on the list.
Thank you for your kind consideration, -Usama
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
