I am happy to cut down the Motivations to 'nothing', I thought I was obligated to say 'something'
On Wed, Feb 25, 2026, 4:04 AM Bellebaum, Thomas < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Deirdre, > > > > My take is that if the authors trim the document's attempt at soft > > > advocacy for use of non-hybrid ML-KEM, and just specify it clearly > > > > Is this in reference to the Motivations section? That can definitely be > > trimmed but was iterated on multiple times because of complaints that > the > > motivation were 'not sufficient' etc > > I do not think there is a conflict. The problem was (and is) not the > amount of text, but the broad scope. > Thereby writing more -- and more detailed -- text for what we consider an > acceptible use case (and what not) may actually result in less "advocacy". > > -- TBB >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
